Third-Party Litigation Funding and the Dodd-Frank Act

16 Tenn. J. Bus. L. 15 (2014)

9 Pages Posted: 19 Feb 2015

Date Written: December 1, 2014

Abstract

This article questions whether the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) should apply to the growing phenomenon of third-party litigation funding, in which outside entities invest in litigation or arbitration for profit. Currently, the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom lightly regulate third-party litigation funding, but the majority of the day-to-day oversight comes through voluntary funder self-regulation. Most third-party funders of commercial disputes are private hedge funds that are subject to the securities regulations of the jurisdictions in which they operate. The Dodd-Frank Act is a relatively new statute in the United States that regulates derivatives, among other financial products. This article begins to explore whether a third-party litigation funding contract is a derivative by examining an Australian High Court decision. If so, then third-party litigation funders may fall within the purview of the Dodd-Frank Act in the future, if their litigation portfolios or assets under management grow large enough.

Keywords: third-party funding, Dodd Frank, derivatives, securities, litigation funding

Suggested Citation

Sahani, Victoria, Third-Party Litigation Funding and the Dodd-Frank Act (December 1, 2014). 16 Tenn. J. Bus. L. 15 (2014), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2566597

Victoria Sahani (Contact Author)

Boston University School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
185
Abstract Views
1,485
Rank
294,681
PlumX Metrics