This reading seminar will focus on select commentaries and rewritten opinions from the text Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court. The rewritten opinions seek to illustrate how decision- makers with feminist viewpoints could have arrived at different decisions using different reasoning in critical Supreme Court cases despite the restrictions of stare decisis. The seminar will discuss the implications of the original decisions and how the application of feminist theory and reasoning can change law and reveal inherent biases in the justice system.

Additional Information:
Credit Hours: 1
Grading Option: Pass/Fail Only
Graduation Writing Requirement: No
Flexible/Upper-Level Writing Requirement: No
Skills Requirement: No
Simulation Course: No
Experiential Learning: No
Seminar: No
Special Withdrawal Course: No
Limited Enrollment Number: 10
Final Exam Given: No
Attendance Policy: Per Statement Of Student Policies
Additional Attendance Policy: Students are expected to attend and actively participate in all meetings.
Teaching Method: In Person

* The law school has a policy that is used to calculate credit hours. Please see the Statement of Student Policies.