‘Playing Doctor’ with the Patient’s Spouse: Alternative Conceptions of Health Professional Liability

Virginia Journal of Social Policy & Law, Vol. 14, p. 308, 2006

50 Pages Posted: 29 May 2009

See all articles by Linda Demaine

Linda Demaine

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Date Written: 2006

Abstract

The purpose of this Article is to provide the in-depth analysis lacking in the case law and scholarly literature on the question of whether a physician's sexual affair with a patient's spouse constitutes malpractice. Regardless of the legal theory pursued by the patient, with one minor exception, physician-affair claims have been decided uniformly and summarily against the patient. The issue may superficially seem to be a narrow one, but its thorough analysis illuminates the logic behind, and limits to, tort law theories as diverse as fraud, infliction of emotional distress, breach of fiduciary duty, and medical malpractice. Even theories of contractual and criminal liability are implicated. To the extent that the judicial reasoning that undergirds the physician-affair jurisprudence can be discerned, it will be evaluated. More importantly, a substantial body of unconsidered scientific literature, professional standards, and case law that bear on this issue will be discussed. With insights derived from these sources, the potential viability of the traditional legal theories espoused in physician affair cases will be reassessed; in addition, two new equitable theories of recovery will be proposed.

Keywords: tort, physician-patient, professional liability

Suggested Citation

Demaine, Linda, ‘Playing Doctor’ with the Patient’s Spouse: Alternative Conceptions of Health Professional Liability (2006). Virginia Journal of Social Policy & Law, Vol. 14, p. 308, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1411214

Linda Demaine (Contact Author)

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )

Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
87
Abstract Views
1,495
Rank
527,705
PlumX Metrics