Money Damages for Fourth Amendment Violations by Federal Officials: An Explanation of Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal

Law & the Social Order, Vol. 43, pp. 43-63, 1971

21 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2009

See all articles by Michael A. Berch

Michael A. Berch

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Date Written: 1971

Abstract

Recently in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, then Supreme Court for the first time held that one who has been subjected to an unreasonable search and seizure by federal officers, has a claim for money damages upon which relief may be granted. In upholding this implied right of action under the Fourth Amendment, the Court did not decide whether a federal official enjoys immunity, nor did it detail the scope or limitations of such an action. In this Article, Professor Berch examines the ramifications of the case in the light of prior judicial and congressional fiats, and analyzes its potential impact for the individual victim, and for victims of violations of other constitutional guarantees.

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, search and seizure, damages

Suggested Citation

Berch, Michael A., Money Damages for Fourth Amendment Violations by Federal Officials: An Explanation of Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal (1971). Law & the Social Order, Vol. 43, pp. 43-63, 1971, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1433865

Michael A. Berch (Contact Author)

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )

Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
50
Abstract Views
1,101
PlumX Metrics