Majority Rule, Exclusive Representation, and the Interests of Individual Workers: Should Exclusivity Be Abandoned?

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 123, p. 897, 1975

42 Pages Posted: 9 Jul 2009

See all articles by George Schatzki

George Schatzki

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Date Written: 1975

Abstract

Under the Taft-Hartley Act, the National Labor Relations Board is authorized to conduct elections among groups of employees to determine whether a union, by obtaining a majority vote, shall be the exclusive representative of any given group of employees for the purposes of collective bargaining with their employer. In addition, the Act has been interpreted to permit, or even require, an employer to recognize a union as the exclusive bargaining representative of a group of its employees without an election if it is established, first, that the union was selected by a majority of those employees to be represented, and second, that the employer's antiunion conduct made a fair election improbable. Since the Act only requires a majority, and not unanimity, the Board is not charged to determine what each individual employee believes or desires to be the appropriate unit; and the Board does not consult the employees or attempt to ascertain their wishes. Rather, the Board looks to many “objective” factors in any given case to make the determination. The union not only negotiates collective bargaining contracts on behalf of the employees who opposed it, but is also the exclusive agent of those opposition employees in settling their individual grievances with the employer. The purposes of this Article are, first, to explore the apparent consequences of the doctrine of exclusive representation, and second, to ask whether the federal labor laws would do better by abandoning the doctrine.

Keywords: labor union, Taft-Hartley Act, exclusive representation

Suggested Citation

Schatzki, George, Majority Rule, Exclusive Representation, and the Interests of Individual Workers: Should Exclusivity Be Abandoned? (1975). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 123, p. 897, 1975, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1432028

George Schatzki (Contact Author)

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )

Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
32
Abstract Views
751
PlumX Metrics