Some Observations and Suggestions Concerning a Misnomer - 'Protected Concerted Activities

Texas Law Review, Vol. 47, p. 378, 1969

26 Pages Posted: 9 Jul 2009

See all articles by George Schatzki

George Schatzki

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Date Written: 1969

Abstract

Professor Schatzki observes that the National Labor Relations Board and the courts have not adequately protected the rights of individual employees to engage in section 7 concerted activities. He suggests that the National Labor Relations Act should be interpreted to allow employees to participate in 'partial strikes' without being, in the Board's terms, 'permanently replaced.' Indeed, Professor Schatzki argues, employees should never be terminated for engaging in concerted activities unless they know or should know that their conduct is illegal.

Keywords: National Labor Relations Board, employees, concerted activities

Suggested Citation

Schatzki, George, Some Observations and Suggestions Concerning a Misnomer - 'Protected Concerted Activities (1969). Texas Law Review, Vol. 47, p. 378, 1969, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1432033

George Schatzki (Contact Author)

Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law ( email )

Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
819
PlumX Metrics