Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Search:

The Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law Faculty Scholarship Repository
*A Service of the Ross-Blakley Law Library*

Publications for Laurence H. Winer	New Search \| Go Back \| Printable Version

FORTHCOMING AND WORKS IN PROGRESS

Laurence H. Winer & Nina J. Crimm, Dilemmas in Regulating Electoral Speech of Nonprofit Organizations (forthcoming).
Laurence H. Winer & Nina J. Crimm, Electoral Speech and Church-State Relations: Laws Must Foster Neutrality, Tolerance, Pluralism and Diversity (forthcoming).
Laurence H. Winer & Nina J. Crimm, God, Schools, and Government Funding: First Amendment Conundrums (Ashgate) (forthcoming 2014).
Laurence H. Winer & Nina J. Crimm, Hallowed First Amendment Freedoms Inhibited by Profanely Anomalous Federal Tax Laws (forthcoming).
Laurence H. Winer & Nina J. Crimm, Tax Laws Ban on Political Campaign Speech by Houses of Worship: Inappropriate Government Censorship and Intrusion on Religion , Bar Ilan U. J. of L. St. & Rel. (forthcoming 2013)

BOOKS

Nina Crimm & Laurence Winer, Politics, Taxes, and the Pulpit: Provocative First Amendment Conflicts (Oxford University Press 2010).
KF6449 .C748 2010

ARTICLES

Gold and Silver, 50 Jurimetrics vii (2009).
K10 .U721
HeinOnline
The Old Order Changeth, 45 Jurimetrics J. 333 (2005). (book review)
K10 .U72
HeinOnline | Lexis | Westlaw
The Soul of the Censor: the FCC Attacks Television Violence, Media Inst. Persp.: First Amendment Analyses Comm. Pol’y Issues (Nov. 2004, at 1).
SSRN
The Constitutional Case Against “Free” Airtime, Cato Inst. Pol’y Analysis (Aug. 6, 2003, at 1).
Abstract
Deficiencies of the "Aspen Matrix" , Issues in Broadcasting & Pub. Int. (March 3, 1998).
HE8700.8 .H55 1998
Public Interest Obligations and First Principles, Issues in Broadcasting & Pub. Int. (March 3, 1998).
HE8700.75 .W55 1998
Thinking Outside the Regulatory Box, Issues in Broadcasting & Pub. Int. (Aug. 4, 1998).
HE8700.8 .H551 1998
The Red Lion of Cable, and Beyond? - Turner Broadcasting v. FCC, 15 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 1 (1997).
K3 .A7
SSRN | HeinOnline | Westlaw | Keycite
The Unsettled Status of Lawyer Advertising and Soliciting After Went for it Decision, Com. Speech Dig. (Summer 1997).
Court May Decide Whether First Amendment Gives Phone Companies Right to Sell Cable TV to Local Customers, West’s Legal News (January 1996).
Must Cable Operators Carry Local Broadcast Stations?, West’s Legal News (September 1996).
Mark A. Hall et al., Medical Liberalism’s Past and Future, 34 Jurimetrics J. 235 (1994). (book review)
K10 .U72
HeinOnline
Lawyer Advertising in Arizona: The State Bar Run Amok, 23 Ariz. St. L. J. 741 (1991).
K1 .R532
SSRN | HeinOnline
Telephone Companies Have First Amendment Rights Too: The Constitutional Case for Entry into Cable, 8 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L. J. 257 (1990).
K3 .A7
SSRN | HeinOnline | Westlaw | Keycite
Dan L. Burk & Laurence H. Winer, Failure to Prepare: Who's Liable in a Computer Disaster?, 5 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L. J. 19 (1989).
K23 .A5399
SSRN | HeinOnline
The New Media Technologies and the Old Public Interest Standard, 29 Jurimetrics J. 377 (1989).
K10 .U72
HeinOnline | Westlaw | Keycite
The Signal Cable Sends, Part I - Why Can't Cable Be More Like Broadcasting?, 46 Md. L. Rev. 212 (1987).
K13 .A7325
SSRN | HeinOnline | Lexis | Westlaw | Keycite | Shepards
The Signal Cable Sends, Part II - Interference From The Indecency Cases?, 55 Fordham L. Rev. 459 (1987).
K6 .O7225
SSRN | HeinOnline | Lexis | Westlaw | Keycite | Shepards

BOOK CHAPTERS

Don’t Bogart That Witness: The Caine Mutiny and Trial by Jury, in Screening Justice: The Cinema of Law (Rennard Strickland et al. eds., W.S. Hein 2005).
PN1995.9.J8 S37 2005
Abstract
Gore Commission Issues Recommendations on Public Interest Obligations for Digital TV, in The First Amendment and the Media (The Institute 1999).
Jury Finds ABC Liable for Fraud and Trespass in Tort Action That May Affect Newsgathering, in The First Amendment and the Media (The Institute 1998).
Children Are Not a Constitutional Blank Check, in Rationales & Rationalizations: Regulating the Electronic Media 69 (Robert Corn-Revere ed., Media Institute 1997).
KF2765 .R38 1997
Abstract
Introduction, in Cross Ownership at the Crossroads: The Case for Repealing the FCC’s Newspaper/broadcast Cross Ownership Ban (Media Institute 1997).

BRIEFS

Public Comments of The Media Institute, the Matter of Public Interest Obligations of TV Broadcast Licensees, FCC Notice of Inquiry, MM Docket No. 99-360 (March 27, 2000).
U.S. v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc, Brief of The Media Institute as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellee, United States v. Playboy Entm’t Group, Inc (2000).
Westlaw

WEBLOGS

You Taught Me Language, and My Profit On’t is I Know How to Curse.

The Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law Faculty Scholarship Repository

Publications for Laurence H. Winer